2025  Journal Article

Teacher-student interactions as a pathway to strengthen working memory in primary school students: a microtrial study protocol

Pub TLDR

Can the way teachers interact with their students in the classroom help kids who struggle with working memory, and which type of teacher support works best?

 

College of Health researcher(s)

OSU Profile

Abstract

Executive function refers to a set of cognitive processes essential for effectively managing complex tasks and enabling goal-directed behavior. Working memory (WM), one of the core executive functions, is the ability to temporarily hold and manipulate information. It plays an important role in various cognitive tasks and learning processes, with WM difficulties greatly affecting students’ academic performance and overall learning. Despite clinical efforts to improve WM in primary school children, results have been inconsistent. Second-generation research has shifted focus to the role of environmental factors, such as teacher-student interactions (TSIs), as a means to better support students’ WM. Based on the Teaching through interactions framework, TSIs are categorized into three domains: instructional support, emotional support, and classroom organization. This study protocol aims to (1) elucidate the theoretical foundations of each type of support and its relationship to WM, (2) provide a comprehensive overview of the intervention procedure, with a specific focus on its development, and (3) lay the groundwork for four microtrials to explore the immediate effects of instructional support, emotional support, and classroom organization provided by the teacher, on student’s WM-related problematic behaviors and performance, compared to a teaching-as-usual (TAU) control group. Each intervention includes a coaching session followed by a 4-week implementation period, during which five high-potential strategies focused on one type of support are applied at the classroom level. To achieve this, 168 teachers, together with students (aged 6–12, exhibiting WM-related problematic behaviors) and parents will be recruited to participate in the study. After the pre-tests, the participants will be randomly assigned to one of three experimental groups or the TAU group. Post-tests will be conducted after intervention implementation. The findings are expected to enhance theoretical understanding of effective WM intervention components and contribute to the development of targeted strategies to strengthen WM in educational settings.

Pollé, S., Sankalaite, S., Huizinga, M., McClelland, M. M., Spilt, J. L., Baeyens, D.  (2025) Teacher-student interactions as a pathway to strengthen working memory in primary school students: a microtrial study protocolFrontiers in Education10
 
Publication FAQ

Understanding Working Memory: A FAQ on Teacher-Student Interactions and Cognitive Development

What is working memory and why is it so important for children?

Working memory is the cognitive ability to temporarily hold and manipulate information for real-time processing. Think of it as the brain's mental workspace or "scratchpad," where we juggle ideas, solve problems, and follow instructions.

This function is critical because research identifies it as the strongest predictor of academic achievement. It is one of the core "executive functions," a set of mental processes that enable goal-directed behavior and the management of complex tasks. A child's working memory capacity directly supports the development of fundamental skills in mathematics, reading, and spelling.

How does working memory develop in children?

Working memory is one of the first executive functions to develop, with a period of substantial growth occurring between the ages of 6 and 12. This development is supported by the biological maturation of key brain regions, including the prefrontal cortex, through processes like myelination and synaptic pruning that make information processing more efficient.

The primary school environment plays a crucial role in stimulating this growth. The structured tasks, clear expectations, repetition of lesson content, and guided instruction common in schools provide the exact kind of stimulation that supports and strengthens a child's developing working memory.

Can working memory be improved, and what have past interventions shown?

Yes, research shows that working memory can be improved through targeted training. Early interventions often took place in clinical settings and involved computer-based training programs designed to challenge students with progressively difficult working memory tasks.

However, these early approaches faced a significant limitation: while they could improve performance on tasks similar to the training exercises (known as "near-transfer effects"), the benefits often did not transfer to unrelated skills. For example, getting better at a memory card game on a computer didn't necessarily lead to better reading comprehension or math ability in the classroom. This lack of "far-transfer effects" prompted a shift in research toward interventions that are integrated directly into the academic environments where working memory is consistently engaged.

What is a "teacher-student interaction" (TSI) and how can it support working memory?

A teacher-student interaction (TSI) refers to the quality of interactions that occur at the entire classroom level. This is distinct from the one-on-one, dyadic teacher-student relationship (TSR).

High-quality TSIs create a supportive and enriching classroom environment that fosters the development of executive functions like working memory. Furthermore, research suggests that for a child to fully benefit from great classroom-level interactions, the quality of their individual relationship with the teacher is also a crucial factor. The core idea behind the new research is that focusing on TSIs is a highly practical and efficient way to support students. By implementing strategies at the classroom level, a teacher can effectively meet the needs of a larger group of children who may be struggling, rather than relying solely on individualized interventions.

What are the three main types of teacher-student interactions?

Based on the influential "Teaching through interactions" framework, TSIs can be organized into three broad domains:

  • Instructional Support: This involves teachers using strategies to promote higher-order thinking and engage students in cognitively stimulating activities. This includes asking open-ended questions, providing feedback, and modeling effective problem-solving.
  • Emotional Support: This focuses on creating a safe, positive, and supportive classroom climate where students feel valued, respected, and emotionally secure. Key features include fostering positive peer interactions and acknowledging students' unique needs.
  • Classroom Organization (Organizational Support): This domain centers on creating a structured, predictable, and proactively managed environment. It includes managing behavior, time, and attention through clear routines and varied teaching methods to help children navigate activities efficiently.

How does "Instructional Support" from a teacher help working memory?

Instructional support helps students acquire "usable knowledge" that they understand and can apply, rather than simply memorizing isolated facts. Teachers achieve this through techniques like:

  • Scaffolding: Providing temporary support to guide students through a task that is just beyond their current ability, then gradually reducing that support as they become more proficient.
  • Modeling: Demonstrating effective strategies for managing information, which students can then observe and imitate.

By making complex tasks more manageable, these strategies prevent students from becoming cognitively overwhelmed and help them use their limited working memory resources more efficiently. These strategies are rooted in foundational learning theories that emphasize social interaction (Vygotsky) and learning through imitation (Bandura).

How does "Emotional Support" from a teacher impact working memory?

By creating an emotionally secure and supportive environment, a teacher helps reduce student stress. This is critical because stress can consume a child's limited cognitive resources. When a child feels safe and valued, those resources are freed up, allowing them to better focus on learning tasks and manage their working memory. This connection is explained by psychological frameworks like Attachment Theory, which highlights how a teacher can act as a secure base, freeing up a child's mental energy for learning.

Furthermore, emotional support boosts a child's intrinsic motivation. A motivated student is better able to allocate their cognitive effort effectively, maximizing the efficiency of their working memory.

What is the role of "Organizational Support" in the classroom?

Organizational support involves creating a well-structured classroom with clear routines and proactive management of behavior, time, and attention. This approach is directly linked to Cognitive Load Theory, which posits that working memory is a limited resource.

A well-organized classroom minimizes distractions and non-essential demands, thereby reducing the "extraneous cognitive load" on a student's working memory. This allows students to free up precious mental space to focus on what matters most: understanding and processing new information.

What is the specific goal of the research study described in the paper?

The study by Pollé and colleagues (2025) aims to compare the immediate effects of the three different types of teacher support—instructional, emotional, and organizational—on students' working memory.

To do this, the researchers will use "microtrials," which are brief, targeted experiments. These trials will test whether specific teacher strategies, implemented over a four-week period, can reduce working memory-related problems in primary school children aged 6 to 12. This microtrial approach allows researchers to efficiently test the specific impact of each type of support in a real-world classroom setting, without requiring a lengthy, year-long intervention. The outcomes for students in each of the three intervention groups will be compared to a "teaching-as-usual" control group to see which type of support is most effective.

What do the researchers hypothesize they will find?

The researchers have two primary hypotheses:

  • They expect that Organizational Support will have the largest positive impact on students' working memory. This will be followed by instructional support, with emotional support predicted to have the smallest, though still potentially positive, effect.
  • They predict that the interventions will be most beneficial for students who exhibit the most significant working memory difficulties at the beginning of the study. In other words, the children who struggle the most are expected to show the greatest gains.