TitleJob strain as a risk factor for clinical depression: systematic review and meta-analysis with additional individual participant data.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2017
AuthorsMadsen, IEH, Nyberg, ST, Hanson, LLMagnusso, Ferrie, JE, Ahola, K, Alfredsson, L, Batty, GD, Bjorner, JB, Borritz, M, Burr, H, Chastang, J-F, de Graaf, R, Dragano, N, Hamer, M, Jokela, M, Knutsson, A, Koskenvuo, M, Koskinen, A, Leineweber, C, Niedhammer, I, Nielsen, ML, Nordin, M, Oksanen, T, Pejtersen, JH, Pentti, J, Plaisier, I, Salo, P, Singh-Manoux, A, Suominen, S, M Have, T, Theorell, T, Toppinen-Tanner, S, Vahtera, J, Väänänen, A, Westerholm, PJM, Westerlund, H, Fransson, EI, Heikkilä, K, Virtanen, M, Rugulies, R, Kivimäki, M
Corporate AuthorsIPD-Work Consortium
JournalPsychol Med
Volume47
Issue8
Pagination1342-1356
Date Published06/2017
ISSN1469-8978
KeywordsDepressive Disorder, Humans, Occupational Stress
Abstract
 

BACKGROUND: Adverse psychosocial working environments characterized by job strain (the combination of high demands and low control at work) are associated with an increased risk of depressive symptoms among employees, but evidence on clinically diagnosed depression is scarce. We examined job strain as a risk factor for clinical depression.

METHOD: We identified published cohort studies from a systematic literature search in PubMed and PsycNET and obtained 14 cohort studies with unpublished individual-level data from the Individual-Participant-Data Meta-analysis in Working Populations (IPD-Work) Consortium. Summary estimates of the association were obtained using random-effects models. Individual-level data analyses were based on a pre-published study protocol.

RESULTS: We included six published studies with a total of 27 461 individuals and 914 incident cases of clinical depression. From unpublished datasets we included 120 221 individuals and 982 first episodes of hospital-treated clinical depression. Job strain was associated with an increased risk of clinical depression in both published [relative risk (RR) = 1.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47-2.13] and unpublished datasets (RR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.04-1.55). Further individual participant analyses showed a similar association across sociodemographic subgroups and after excluding individuals with baseline somatic disease. The association was unchanged when excluding individuals with baseline depressive symptoms (RR = 1.25, 95% CI 0.94-1.65), but attenuated on adjustment for a continuous depressive symptoms score (RR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.81-1.32).

CONCLUSIONS: Job strain may precipitate clinical depression among employees. Future intervention studies should test whether job strain is a modifiable risk factor for depression.

DOI10.1017/S003329171600355X
Alternate JournalPsychol Med
PubMed ID28122650
PubMed Central IDPMC5471831
Grant ListMR/K013351/1 / / Medical Research Council / United Kingdom
MR/K026992/1 / / Medical Research Council / United Kingdom